WebC++ is a horrible language. It's made more horrible by the fact that a lot of substandard programmers use it, to the point where it's much much easier to generate total and utter … WebApr 20, 2024 · C++ was criticized again as “bad” This time, Linus once again bombarded C++ in a comment by netizen @mss on the Linux Weekly News website: The solution is simple: just use C++ instead of Rust.
Why Microsoft Is Dumping C & C++ For This New Programming Language
WebC++ is considered bad for two principal reasons: it’s a very big and complex language; in fact, the biggest and most complex in the world. it has numerous internal inconsistencies and traps that make programming a … WebMar 10, 2015 · Posted by Soulskill on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @03:47PM from the harsh-language-about-a-harsh-language dept. Nerval's Lobster writes: Perhaps the most famous rant against C++ came from none other than Linus Torvalds in 2007. "C++ is a horrible language," he wrote, for starters. "It's made more horrible by the fact that a lot of … cancer and allied ailments
Linus Torvalds: “C++ is really a terrible language!”
WebJul 2, 2015 · A programming language is good or bad, depending on whether it makes the programmer’s job less difficult and more pleasant. This is why languages like Python and … WebAdmittedly C++ templates throw up some truly hideous compile errors, but the syntax itself is quite easy to get used to. "The preprocessor system of #include's adds a lot of complexity" Same can be said for C. And yes, a good module system would be nice. Web1 day ago · C++ std::memcpy is typically well optimized for large copies; e.g. glibc's is. If you're on a server (where per-core memory bandwidth is lower than desktop/laptop, and can't come close to saturating B/W) it could possibly be worth having another thread or two do part of the copy, but synchronization overhead will eat into the gains. fishing stove and gas